JurídicoESEN
Order (Auto)June 1, 2004

A- de 2004

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Alvaro Tafur Galvis

✓Claimant Ramiro Alfredo Larrazabal Manjarres

✓
Topic · hard data
Conflicto De Competencia. Corte Suprema De Justicia
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Acto Administrativo Proferido Por La Corte Suprema De Justicia
  • Aplicación del Decreto 1372 de 2000 artículo 1 numeral 1
Conflicto De Competencia En Tutela
  • Decisión administrativa de la Sala Plena de la Corte Suprema de Justicia
Acto Administrativo Proferido Por Autoridades Judiciales
  • Aplicación del Decreto 1382 de 2000 artículo 1 numeral 1
3 topics · 3 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)

Se remitió al Tribunal Contencioso Administrativo de Cundinamarca, Sección Primera, Subsección B, el expediente de la tutela promovida por el ciudadano de la referencia contra la Sala Plena de la Corte Suprema de Justicia para que tramite y decida en forma inmediata, de conformidad con lo señalado en el Art. 1º del Decreto Reglamentario 1382 de 2000.

Case-law reporter's text · normalized for reading (all caps → sentence case)
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. En merito de lo expuesto, la Sala Plena de la Corte Constitucional,
  2. RESUELVE:
  3. Remitir al Tribunal Contencioso Administrativo de Cundinamarca, Seccion Primera, Subseccion B, el expediente de la accion de tutela promovida por el Doctor Ramiro Alfredo Larrazabal Manjarres contra la Sala Plena de la Corte Suprema de Justicia, para que la tramite y decida en forma inmediata.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.